Kako stvari vznikajo

The emergence of text. How? Emergence of life, thought … What drives the emergence of new (being). What is “a being”? What is “not-being”? Who or what drives us? What is our vehicle? Something physical? Something biological? Something supernatural?

What drives text? Or better: how the text drives us? Or even better: how are we driven by meme complexes? What is our role in morphology of meme complexes?

Text about driving? Driving of brands or driving relations? What are phisics, biology, nevrology talking to human sciences?

Are brands “only” bio-complexes?

Is driving ethical? Even if we do not know by what we are driven? What builds us? Wisdom? Power? Beauty?

Grand Unified Theory (GUT) meltdown

It is more than 50 years since Albert Einstein died, more than 20 years of Steven Hawking conceptualization of GUT, more than 20 years of Steven Weinberg string theory that is stringing (striving) to string all forces of nature in one (mathematical) formula. All efforts, funds (more than 80% of US funds for physics is allocated to string theorists) are bringing no results. Better: they are not supporting the thesis that there is conceivable GUT, but are supporting that GUT is not mathematical. There is not one viewpoint. There is not one center in the brain that would represent the self. There is not even one universe. There is not one interpretation of any word what even of a poem. every interpretation is only a new word waiting for interpretation … that is another word… There is one mindfulness (buddhism), but one for each person - and the one that brings person being mindful in a state of understanding himself as completely decentralized, atomized, alogical, non personal, non digital. There are forces like electromagnetism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force and gravity. But there is neither GOD neither GUT that would unify them.

Related posts

Post a comment