Kako stvari vznikajo

The emergence of text. How? Emergence of life, thought … What drives the emergence of new (being). What is “a being”? What is “not-being”? Who or what drives us? What is our vehicle? Something physical? Something biological? Something supernatural?

What drives text? Or better: how the text drives us? Or even better: how are we driven by meme complexes? What is our role in morphology of meme complexes?

Text about driving? Driving of brands or driving relations? What are phisics, biology, nevrology talking to human sciences?

Are brands “only” bio-complexes?

Is driving ethical? Even if we do not know by what we are driven? What builds us? Wisdom? Power? Beauty?

What C. Hitchens taught me against his will.

How wonderful experience: only after I went really deeply through the work of Dawkins, Hitchens (who passed away a day ago - and hence this post of mine), Dennet, S. Blackmore… Only after my atheism was so clearly and strictly suported by these great minds (and some other from the world scientific community)… Only then and only when I started to be “a perfect atheist”, I started to understand the value of belief. Only after rejecting each and every God that was created by mankind it became possible to conceptualize “belief” as a binder, a starting and finishing point of every rationale. Only after there is literary no place for God in the universe, the necessity of Grand architect of all worlds becomes clear. Only after you accept, that science is 100% rational, the necessity for belief, that is a lubricant for dry rational particles, emerges. More you go to the east, more you come to the west. It is an experience that contradicts all that you, Hitch, had in mind while pleading against religion. I could not care less: I have to thank you! Rest in Peace.

Related posts

Post a comment